County of maui v. hawaii wildlife fund. Appellees County of Maui, Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club ...

In County of Maui v. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund, all nine jus

This Note examines a recent Supreme Court decision, County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, which appeared to endorse a theory of federal regulation of groundwater discharges under the Clean Water Act. County of Maui established a "functional equivalent" standard, under which a discharge through groundwater is subject to the Clean Water Act ...HAWAI 'I WILDLIFE FUND; SIERRA CLUB - MAUI GROUP; SURFRIDER FOUNDATION; WEST MAUI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION, Respondents. _____ On Writ of Certiorari to the ... Solid Waste Agency of N. Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) ..... 4, 13 Tin Cup, LLC v. U.S. Army Corps of ...County of Maui versus the Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Mr. Lin. ORAL ARGUMENT OF ELBERT LIN. ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER: MR. LIN: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court: This case is not about whether the releases from Maui's underground injection wells should be regulated at all but how. They are already regulated under several existing state1 County of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1468 (2020). 2 A point source is defined as “any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance.” 33 U.S.C.S. § 1362(14) (LexisNexis 2021). 3 County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. at 1468. 4 Id. at 1476–77. 5 See Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) (plurality opinion) (considering ...Jan 21, 2021 · The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is issuing a memorandum to provide guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant ... 23 avr. 2020 ... of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, — U.S. — (2020), was first filed in 2012 and addressed unpermitted discharges of treated sewage water made by ...County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund & the Future of the Clean Water Act. February 12, 2020 Brent McKnight Jr. Uncategorized Post navigation.On April 23rd, the Supreme Court handed environmentalists a victory in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, holding that the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates discharges of pollution into groundwater that emerge in surface water if “functionally equivalent” to direct surface water discharges. Justice Breyer wrote the six to three majority ...Appellees County of Maui, Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club - Maui Group, Surfrider Foundation and West Maui Preservation Association answering brief due 06/14/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11994287] (RT) [Entered: 02/05/2021 12:04 PM]On September 20, 2019, the Maui County Council voted 5-4 to settle a lawsuit—County of Maui v.Hawai'i Wildlife Fund—over the County's alleged violations of the Clean Water Act ("CWA ...Plaintiffs Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club, Surfrider Foundation, and West Maui Preservation Association move for summary judgment, arguing that the undisputed …The much-anticipated United States Supreme Court decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund was released last week. It is a fascinating decision that results in the Court adopting a “functional equivalent” test. [Click here.] Background Under the federal Clean Water Act, it is unlawful to discharge a pollutant from a point source …2022] County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund 553 the Court’s decision in County of Maui does create a broad rule, it is the right decision by the Court to ensure States’ rights and the purpose of the CWA remains intact. The language of the CWA is intended to be vague and Clean Water Act. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case asked whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants that originate from a non-point source can be traced to reach navigable ...County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund & the Future of the Clean Water Act. February 12, 2020 Brent McKnight Jr. Uncategorized Post navigation.Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program for point source discharges that travel through groundwater before reaching a water of the United States. Consistent with EPA Guidance;Sep 21, 2023 · Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 42,700 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 988 casebooks https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-... Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui (15-17447) May 6, 2016. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is considering the viability of the so-called “conduit theory” of liability under the Clean Water Act—that unconfined groundwater can act as a point source if it conveys pollutants from a point source into waters of the United States. CSAC ...That question is at the root of County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, which the Supreme Court agreed today to hear. PLF has filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case. This case is about whether the Clean Water Act regulates pollution that reaches surface water by means of groundwater.County of Maui versus the Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Mr. Lin. ORAL ARGUMENT OF ELBERT LIN. ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER: MR. LIN: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court: This case is not about whether the releases from Maui's underground injection wells should be regulated at all but how. They are already regulated under several existing state of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020) (“Maui”), on a case by case basis, in the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act) Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program.2. The Maui decision outlines seven IMDb is the world's most popular and authoritative source for movie, TV and celebrity content. Find ratings and reviews for the newest movie and TV shows. Get personalized recommendations, and learn where to watch across hundreds of streaming providers.On April 23, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund , No. 18-260, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), a case which pitted environmental groups against a wastewater reclamation facility operated by the County of Maui, and decided a fundamental question regarding the scope and ...Feb 7, 2022 · 1 County of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1468 (2020). 2 A point source is defined as “any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance.” 33 U.S.C.S. § 1362(14) (LexisNexis 2021). 3 County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. at 1468. 4 Id. at 1476–77. 5 See Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) (plurality opinion) (considering ... On April 23, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund that found a point source discharge of pollutants into groundwater, that then reaches navigable waters, is regulated under the Clean Water Act. Writing for the Court's majority, Justice Stephen Bryer said the Clean Water Act requires a permit "if the addition of the pollutants through groundwater is ...County of Maui V. Hawaii Wildlife Fund: The lawsuit against Maui County being watched around the country. Cover design by Albert Cortez MAUITIME. MauiTime, August 30, 2019. By Axel Beers. In 2014, residents of ...Sep 21, 2023 · Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 42,700 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 988 casebooks https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-... Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notThe panel held that the County was liable under the Act because it discharged pollutants from a point source, the HAWAI‘I WILDLIFE FUND V. CTY. OF MAUI 3 pollutants were fairly traceable from the point source to a navigable water such that the discharge was the functional equivalent of a discharge into the navigable water, and the pollutant ...On April 23, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), a case which pitted environmental groups ... The County of Maui appealed the Ninth Circuit's decision and argued that the CWA's permitting5 mai 2020 ... ... County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund case. The brief described the impact of groundwater pollution from Minntac's tailings basin and how ...See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus . COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII. v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND . ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . No. 18–260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020 Get County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today.On July 15, 2021, the Hawaii' federal district court became the first court to publish an opinion utilizing the functional equivalent analysis ("FEA") established by the Supreme Court of the United States last year in the County of Maui v. Hawaii' Wildlife Fund (2020).LII note: the oral arguments in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (No. 18-260) are now available from Oyez. The U.S. Supreme Court has now decided County of Maui, ... Norman A. Dupont: County of Maui v. Hawai'i Wildlife Fund: A Preview of the Supreme Court's Review of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction over Groundwater, ABA (May 10 ...This CLE course will discuss the Supreme Court's decision in County of Maui, Hawai'i. v. Hawai'i Wildlife Fund, which sets forth a new test for when discharges to jurisdictional waters via groundwater require NPDES permitting under the Clean Water Act (CWA): when the discharge to groundwater is the "functional equivalent of direct discharge."This program will discuss and debate the critical ...There is a total of 18 islands that make up the Hawaiian Islands. Within the 18 islands, there are eight main islands and 10 smaller ones. The eight main islands are Hawaii, Maui, Kahoolawe, Molokai, Lanai, Kauai, Oahu and Niihau.Maui, Hawaii is known for its stunning beaches, breathtaking landscapes, and rich culture. It’s no wonder why so many visitors flock to this beautiful island every year. To truly experience everything Maui has to offer, renting a car is an ...Applying the Supreme Court's County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Program. Document date. 1/14/2021. Document SKU. AD05255. Document ID. AD05255. Purchase Document. Site Links. Home; Sitemap; Contact; For Members; Sign in;“County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund.” Oyez, https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-260. Environmental Works. “History of the Clean Water Act ...In 2020, the fate of the nation's clean water hung in the balance in County of Maui v. Hawaiʻi Wildlife Fund. Ultimately, the nation's highest court sided ...Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 … (2 times) Milwaukee v. Illinois, 451 U.S. 304 (2 times) View All Authorities Share Support FLP . CourtListener is a project of ... County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 18-260.County of Maui versus the Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Mr. Lin. ORAL ARGUMENT OF ELBERT LIN. ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER: MR. LIN: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court: This case is not about whether the releases from Maui's underground injection wells should be regulated at all but how. They are already regulated under several existing state In early 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court utilized his expertise in the case County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, that closed a massive loophole in the Clean Water Act, which affirmed for the first time that pollutants that flow through groundwater and then emerge into surface waters are in fact covered by the act.Plaintiffs Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club, Surfrider Foundation, and West Maui Preservation Association move for summary judgment, arguing that the undisputed …HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND DECISION. THE RECENT U.S. SUPRME COURT DECISION IN COUNTY OF MAUI V. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND, 140 S. CT. 1462 (2020), LIKELY WILL LEAD TO ...18-260 COUNTY OF MAUI, HI V. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND DECISION BELOW: 886 F.3d 737 GRANTED LIMITED TO. Monthly Argument Calendar November 2019. 80 minutes for argument) (2)17-1678 HERNANDEZ V. MESA 18-260 Wednesday, November 6 (5) COUNTY OF MAUI, HI V. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND Wednesday, November 13 (3)18-1171 COMCAST CORP. V. NAT.21 sept. 2021 ... ... County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, which devised a test that says permits are required under the CWA when indirect discharges ...Jun 3, 2020 · The judgment of this court, 886 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2018), was vacated by the Supreme Court in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1462, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2020). We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020) Rachel L. Wagner . The Supreme Court of the United States was recently asked to decide whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit for the discharge of pollutants that originate from a point source but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source.Hawaii Wildlife Fund. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 590 U.S. ___ (2020) Docket No. 18-260. Granted: February 18, 2019. Argued: November 5, 2019. Justia Summary. Maui’s wastewater reclamation facility collects sewage, partially treats it, and daily pumps around four million gallons of treated water into the ground through four wells. Hawaii Wildlife Fund concerning Clean Water Act ("CWA") jurisdiction over discharges to groundwater. 1 Maui involved a discharge to groundwater that ultimately discharged into the Pacific ...The opinions collected here are those issued during October Term 2019 (October 07, 2019, through October 04, 2020).Opinions are posted on the website upon release in slip opinion format. Slip opinions remain posted until replaced with opinions edited to reflect the usual publication style of the United States Reports, including final …Clean Water Act. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case asked whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants that originate from a non-point source can be traced to reach navigable ... On Appeal from the U.S. District Court, Dist. of Hawaii No. 12-cv-198, Hon. Susan Oki Mollway, District Judge BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES ... Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui, 24 F. Supp. 3d 980 (D. Haw. 2014) ..... passim Headwaters, Inc. v. Talent ...Lions are the majestic mammals known for strength and power. Here are 10 cool facts about lions, aCC0rding to the World Wildlife Fund and Just Fun Facts. Size matters in the animal kingdom with lions being the second largest cat in the worl...Hawaii Wildlife Fund et al v. County of Maui. Hawaii District Court: Judge: Susan Oki Mollway: Referred: Barry M Kurren: Case #: 1:12-cv-00198 Nature of Suit: 893 Other Statutes - Environmental Matters: Cause: 33:1319 Clean Water Act: Case Filed: Apr 16, 2012: Re-opened: Jun 03, 2020: Terminated: ...Nov 20, 2018 · County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. Docketed: August 30, 2018: Linked with 17A1343: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Case Numbers: (15-17447) Decision Date: March 30, 2018: Rehearing Denied: Discretionary Court Decision Date: Questions Presented Feb 1, 2021 · 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020). 2 Guidance Memorandum, Applying the Supreme Court’s County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge ... The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is one of the most successful conservation organizations in the world. From working to save endangered species to educating people about sustainable practices in all parts of life, the WWF works for the genuine...Feb 7, 2022 · 1 County of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1468 (2020). 2 A point source is defined as “any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance.” 33 U.S.C.S. § 1362(14) (LexisNexis 2021). 3 County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. at 1468. 4 Id. at 1476–77. 5 See Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) (plurality opinion) (considering ... Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. No. 18-260. COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, PETITIONER v.April 24, 2020. Fred Andes is a partner with Barnes & Thornburg and the leader of the firm's water team. In this episode Fred explains the County of Maui v.Hawaii Wildlife Fund, a U.S. Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act, specifically whether pollution from a point of discharge into a groundwater source that can potentially reach navigable waterways ...Docket for Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui, 1:12-cv-00198-SOM-KJM — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. ... Hawaii Wildlife Fund, West Maui Preservation Association, Sierra Club - Maui Group may be submitted to the appropriate judge for approval. The filing party ...Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notPetitioner County of Maui, Hawaii Respondent Hawaii Wildlife Fund Docket No. 18-260 Decided By Roberts Court Lower Court United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Citation 590 US _ (2020) Granted February 19, 2019 Argued November 06, 2019 Decided April 23, 2020Hawaii Wildlife Fund v County of Maui + Follow. Sackett + Follow. Sackett v EPA + Follow. SCOTUS + Follow. Waters of the United States + Follow. West Virginia v EPA + Follow. Civil Procedure ...16 juil. 2021 ... The decision in Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui is the first major ruling since the Supreme Court took up the case last year. It ...of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020) (“Maui”), on a case by case basis, in the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act) Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program.2. The Maui decision outlines seven County of Maui v. Hawai'i Wildlife Fund. No. 18-260 - Argued November 6, 2019. At Issue. Whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants originate from a point source but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source, such as groundwater. Advocates.Hawaii Wildlife Fund on February 19, 2019.12 In Maui, a group of ... of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund, No. 18-. 260, at 10–11 (Jan. 3, 2019). 370. Id ...Clean Water Act. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case asked whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants that originate from a non-point source can be traced to reach navigable ... All parties agree that the wastewater enters 8 COUNTY OF MAUI v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND. THOMAS, J., dissenting. groundwater from the wells and does not directly enter nav-igable waters. Based on these undisputed facts, there is no “discharge,” so I would reverse the judgment of the Ninth Circuit. I respectfully dissent.Clean Water Act: County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund11 In one of its major environmental rulings of the 2019-2020 term, the Supreme Court addressed the scope of the CWA’s applicability to pollutant discharges that migrate through groundwater to regulated navigable surface waters.12 In County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Court held Lisa Soronen. June 4, 2019. In County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court will decide whether groundwater is subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting requirements under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The State and Local Legal Center (SLLC) filed an amicus curie brief arguing that it ...Maui, Hawaii is known for its stunning beaches, breathtaking landscapes, and rich culture. It’s no wonder why so many visitors flock to this beautiful island every year. To truly experience everything Maui has to offer, renting a car is an ...2 Guidance Memorandum, Applying the Supreme Court's County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit ...The issue in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, one which had long divided the lower courts, was this: everyone agrees that the Clean Water Act regulates, and requires National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits for, the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States from point sources; and everyone agrees that ...Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notInstead of gutting the Clean Water Act as many had feared, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a surprisingly measured decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, largely preserving the jurisdictional reach of the iconic law. Yet in the wake of the decision, the courts and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will almost ...Home supreme County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Provided by Justia Syllabus Opinion of The Court Opinion (Breyer) Facts of the Case Provided by OyezIn County of Maui v. Hawai’i Wildlife Fund, the question at issue was whether the CWA’s jurisdiction is triggered by point source discharges into groundwater when that discharged material ultimately reaches the waters of the United States through natural connections between groundwater and surface water. 1 On April 23, ...23 avr. 2020 ... Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, addressing whether the Clean Water ...Jan 21, 2021 · Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program for point source discharges that travel through groundwater before reaching a water of the United States. Consistent with EPA Guidance; Apr 24, 2020 · On April 23rd, the Supreme Court handed environmentalists a victory in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, holding that the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates discharges of pollution into groundwater that emerge in surface water if “functionally equivalent” to direct surface water discharges. Justice Breyer wrote the six to three majority ... Feb 1, 2021 · 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020). 2 Guidance Memorandum, Applying the Supreme Court’s County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge ... Honua Kai Maui Resort is a luxurious vacation destination that offers breathtaking ocean views and exceptional amenities. Located on the beautiful Kaanapali Beach in Lahaina, Hawaii, this resort is perfect for those who want to enjoy a rela...Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, 2015 WL 328227, at *5–6 (D. Haw. Jan. 23, 2015). The court acknowledged that no study confirms the “point of entry into the ocean of flow from [W]ells 1 and 2.” Id. at *2. But it nonetheless held against the County after “repeatedlyIn County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court held 6-3 that when there is a “functional equivalent of a direct discharge” from a point source to navigable waters, an appropriate permit is required under the CWA. This ruling, according to several policy experts, is expected to cause future uncertainties and continued ...memorandum on the application of the U.S. Supreme Court's 23 April 2020 decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (Maui).1 As a result of the Maui ruling, a range of activities—from .... Appellees County of Maui, Hawaii Wildlife Fund, SCounty of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Dan Ziebar The first post-County of Maui decision, not surprisingly, was on remand in that case to the federal district court in Hawaii. See Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131803 ...27 jui. 2023 ... These cases are County of Maui,. Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund,89 and Inland Empire Water Keeper v. Corona Clay Co.90 These two cases are very ... In this webinar, three current and forme May 7, 2020 · With the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020) entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are not directly discharging pollutants into a waterway. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is issuing a memorandum to provide guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant ... The much-discussed April 2020 Clean Water Act r...

Continue Reading